Chapter 4: Logic

Section 4.4: Variations of Statements

Conditional statements come in many different forms, as I am sure you've started to see in this Chapter. In mathematics, you've learned properties that allow you to write mathematical expressions in a different way. One example of this is the symmetric property that says "If $x=3$, then $3=x$". In logic, we have properties that are similar to those as well.

Variations of Conditional Statements
Name Symbolic Words
Conditional $$p \rightarrow q$$ If p, then q.
Converse $$q \rightarrow p$$ If q, then p.
Inverse $$\sim p \rightarrow \sim q$$ If not p, then not q.
Contrapositive $$\sim q \rightarrow \sim p$$ If not q, then not p.

Some of these expressions are logically equivalent to the others. This means they are logically the same argument and an alternative way to write an argument.

p q Conditional $$p \rightarrow q$$ Contrapositive $$\sim q \rightarrow \sim p$$
TTTT
TFFF
FTTT
FFTT

As we can see, the original conditional statement is logically equivalent to the contrapositive.

p q Converse $$q \rightarrow p$$ Inverse $$\sim p \rightarrow \sim q$$
TTTT
TFTT
FTFF
FFTT

In this one, we can see that the converse statement and the inverse statement are logically equivalent to each other.

Example 1

Write a statement that is logically equivalent to "If I eat this giant cookie, then I will feel sick."

Solution

Since this is the conditional statement, a statement logically equivalent to the conditional is the contrapositive. This means we would need to flip and negate our p and q. This would give us:

$$\text{"If I do not feel sick, then I will not eat this giant cookie."}$$

Disjunction to Conditional Conversion

Sometimes we need to be able to write a disjunction as a conditional, or a conditional as a disjunction. To do that, we would use the logically equivalent statements below:

$$p \vee q \equiv \sim p \rightarrow q$$

Example 2

Find the conditional, converse, inverse, and contrapositive of the following statement: "Charity goes to the Mall or to TJ Maxx."

Solution

Our first step is to write it as a logically equivalent statement in terms of a conditional. From our rule above, we would negate the p. Then the p implies the q, giving us:

$$\text{If Charity doesn't go to the mall, then she will go to TJ Maxx.}$$

Now that we have our conditional statement, we can write the converse, inverse, and contrapositive.

Form Symbolic Words
Converse$$q \rightarrow p$$If Charity goes to TJ Maxx, then she will not go to the mall.
Inverse$$\sim p \rightarrow \sim q$$If Charity goes to the mall, then she will not go to TJ Maxx.
Contrapositive$$\sim q \rightarrow \sim p$$If Charity doesn't go to TJ Maxx, then she will go to the mall.